Evolution of
world trade produces immense effect to legal system of all countries. In the
old days when world trade was subjected to protectionism, legal mechanism of
all countries leaned upon State close control system via State permission or
licensing. The State control system
however came up with red tape, duplication of works and corruptions. During the
path to liberalization of world trade in 1980s, deregulation and
self-regulation were fashionable regime of legislation in OECD countries with a
view to reduce those problems and to enhance their competitiveness in global
market. Nevertheless, many crises broken during 1990s incited fear of the
policy makers in several jurisdictions on self-regulation in some sectors and
close State control had been brought back into action once but limited to some
sensitive sectors. During the grate expansion of free trade in 2000s, OECD
countries had led better regulation policy into their legislative processes in
order to reduce unnecessary compliance costs produced by legislation and born
by both private and public sectors. When those costs have plunged, the national
competitiveness of all OECD members has gone up high since then. Thailand in
contrast still confines her legislative concept upon State control system in
almost all activities in regardless of new paradigm of world trade. That is why
this country is unable to escape from the middle income trap.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น